| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Wonder how the classic Romans would have pronounced Richardoestesia.
Sara Burch
<sara@burch.cc> To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk>
Sent by: cc:
paleonet-owner@n Subject: Re: paleonet Re: Latin
hm.ac.uk (written/pronounced)
07/26/02 05:20
PM
Please respond
to paleonet
on 7/26/02 4:00 PM, Robert L. Fleisher wrote:
> My best example, and a friend and I have collected several of them, is
> Archaeopteryx. Customary, indeed virtually unanimous pronunciation, of
> course,
> is Ar-kee-OP-ter-ix. But the root words, as I understand it, are archaeo
> (ancient) and pteryx (wing). So it seems to me that the appropriate
> pronunciation is Ar-kee-o-TER-ix (which is, I gather, how the PT
diphthong
> would
> be pronounced in Latin--or in Pterodactyl).
Actually, the "ae" dipthong in latin is pronounced as "ay", so a
theoretically correct pronunciation would be "ar-kay-o-TER-ix"
Of course, its also very common among the layperson to pronounce
Ankylosaurus, "an-klee-o-SAWR-us" instead of "an-kie-lo-SAWR-us". And, I've
heard paleontologists pronounce Ornithischia "or-ni-THIS-kia" (with a soft
TH), and "on-ni-THISH-ia". Same with Saurischia.
So my point is, there are lots of mispronunciations and different
pronunciations. In fact, they vary a lot from country to country. Even if
it
was standardized now, I have a feeling it would be like changing
Brontosaurus to Apatosaurus, but worse! :)
Sara
Partial index: