| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I am not sure of myself on this point, but might not letters to the authorities be more effective were they from scientists other than paleontologists? Are there any systematists/biogeographers/molecular biologists and members of other allied fields willing to take up the cause? I should think that letters from such people might have greater impact. John Huss >Hi again, > >Below, you will find a sample letter provided by Dr. Schultze (the >letter was actually written and sent by another person). Based on >Dr. Schultze's original message (with Dr. Evans' correction on one >of the fax numbers), your letter of support should be faxed and/or >e-mailed to the following German authorities: > > >An den >Regierenden Bürgermeister >Klaus Wowereit >Berliner Rathaus >Rathausstr. 15 >10173 Berlin >GERMANY >Fax: XX49-30-9026-2013 >email: Der-Regierende-Buergermeister@SKZL.Verwalt-Berlin.de > > >Senator fur Wissenschaft, Forschung, and Kultur >des Landes Berlin >Herrn Dr. Thomas Flierl >Brunnenstr. 188-190 >D-10119 Berlin >GERMANY >Telefax: ++49 30 9022 8450 or 8451 > > >Der Präsident >Prof. Dr. J. Mlynek >Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin >Under den Linden 6 >D-10099 Berlin >GERMANY >Telefax: XX49-30-2093-2729 >email: praesident@hu-berlin.de > > >SAMPLE LETTER >>>> "Schultze, H.P." <H-P.Schultze@MUSEUM.HU-Berlin.de> 05/17/02 03:03AM >>> >______________________________________________ > >Address >Address >Address >Address > > 14 May 2002 > >Dear *******************, > >Future of the Palaeontological Institute, Museum für Naturkunde > >I learnt today that the Expert Commission, set up to determine the >future of the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, has recommended that >the professorship of Palaeontology at the Museum be replaced with a >professorship of Systematics and Biogeography, and that the >Institute of Palaeontology should cease to exist as a distinct >entity within the Museum. I am writing to express my deep concern at >this proposal. As a palaeontologist and systematic biologist with 17 >years' academic experience in the Zoology Departments of the >universities of Cambridge and Oxford, as well as the Palaeontology >Department of the Natural History Museum (formerly British Museum of >Natural History), I believe I am qualified to comment on the >situation. > The statement by the Expert Commission, that palaeontology >"has no scientific autonomy" and is therefore inappropriate for a >professorship, is so extraordinary that it cannot be allowed to pass >unchallenged. At one level, no branch of science is "autonomous", as >all connect with adjacent disciplines to form part of a greater >whole. However, it is a grave misunderstanding to claim that >palaeontology has no internal coherence beyond the fact that it >deals with fossils. > In the first instance, all areas of palaeontology are unified >conceptually by the unique challenges and possibilities offered by >the study of evolution and ecosystem change through deep time, using >a time-extensive but incomplete record of organismal diversity. >There is an extensive literature dealing with the highly distinctive >methodological framework for this science, including numerous >publications in the highest-profile international journals such as >Nature and Science. Secondly, from a collections management >perspective, palaeontological collections present a set of >distinctive challenges in terms of specimen conservation, locality >documentation, conservation and ownership of localities, and so on, >all of which differ substantially from those attaching to >collections of modern organisms. Thirdly, from the point of view of >the visiting public, palaeontology most certainly does form a >distinctive and coherent whole - and is usually the overwhelmingly >most popular part of a museum's displays: children come to see >dinosaurs, not "the fossilized forms of zoology"! > For all these reasons, I believe it is essential that the >Institute of Palaeontology is retained in its present form within >the Museum für Naturkunde, and continues to be headed by a Professor >of Palaeontology - as is normal practice at almost all comparable >institutions in other countries. The Institute commands >international respect as one of the world leaders in >palaeontological research and curation: it would be a tragedy, and a >significant blow to the Museum's international standing in this >area, for it to be dismembered. > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > > ****your name***** > >_________________________________ >Kenshu Shimada, Ph.D. >Assistant Professor >Environmental Science Program > and Department of Biological Sciences >DePaul University >2325 N. Clifton Avenue >Chicago, IL 60614, USA > AND >Research Associate >Sternberg Museum of Natural History >Fort Hays State University >Hays, KS 67601, USA
Partial index: