At 8:01 AM -0500 4/25/02, you wrote:
>I recently received this question. Does anyone know the answer?
>
>We also have a couple of trilobites cataloged as Acaste birminghamensis.
>However, my understanding is that the genus name was changed to
>Llandovacaste, but I don't know the reference. Is 'Llandovacaste' correct?
>
>Thanks,
>David
try the following:
TI: Silurian acastacean trilobites of the Americas
AU: Edgecombe, Gregory D
SO: Journal of Paleontology, vol.67, no.4, pp.535-548, Jul 1993
...
DE: Descriptors
Acastacea; Acaste birminghamensis; Acaste lokii; Acaste zerinae; Alabama; Andinacaste ledgrandi; Argentina; Arthropoda; Australasia; Australia; Bolivia; Catavi Formation; Dalmanitiformes; Humevale Formation; Invertebrata; Jujuy Argentina; Llandovacaste; Llandoverian; Longisulcata; Lower Silurian; Maine; new taxa; Paleozoic; Paraguay; Pembroke Formation; Phacopida; Phacopidina obsoleta; Phacopina; Red Mountain Formation; Silurian; South America; Tennessee; Trilobita; Trilobitomorpha; United States; Venezuela; Victoria Australia; Washington County Maine CL: Classification
christopher