| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Review taken from The Australian Geologist 120, 22-23 (by permission of editor and author) Palaeobiogeography of Australasian faunas and floras Edited by A.J. Wright, J.A. Talent, G.C. Young & J. Laurie. (2000) Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 23, 515 pp. ISSN 0810-8889. Obtainable from the Geological Society of Australia, Suite 706, 301 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. Price $A81.95 incl. GST for orders within Australia; $A84.50 for overseas orders (both include surface postage). Reviewed by Art Boucot, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University This is a most valuable volume for anyone concerned with Phanerozoic biogeography. It also summarizes in readily available form a truly monumental mass of taxonomic and biostratigraphic information for the Australian Phanerozoic, plus adjacent regions with emphasis on New Zealand, covering animal and plant groups, marine and nonmarine, vertebrate and invertebrate, complete with extensive references. The only significant omission is the Triassic, for which one hopes that the "delayed" item will be brought to rapid completion and publication. Ninety authors took part in the project, with multiauthored chapters for every period except the Permian, which resulted in contributions from informed specialists for almost all of the biotic groups considered. A welcome feature is the emphasis on data as contrasted with speculation. The complexities of local stratigraphic nomenclature are handled in a manner making understanding by the reader very easy both through geological time and geographically; one does not get bogged down in a mass of nomenclature. The authors have gone to great trouble to provide tabular and appendix presentations that make the material readily accessible to the outsider, whether a concerned specialist or generalist. Succinct summaries and conclusions are provided for the data at several levels from the individual biotic group in each time interval up to the overall biogeographic picture during each geological period. The overall layout of the book is excellent, as is the quality of reproduction, and the price is very moderate in these times of three figure costs for all too many books. There are very, very few printer's errors (I noted none of any consequence). The overall arrangement is by geological period beginning with the Cambrian. Following introductory materials that cover such things as paleogeographies that have been proposed for the time and summaries of the available "absolute" age data, come sections dealing with the available animal and plant groups, each one prepared by a qualified specialist, followed by comprehensive biogeographic summaries. The volume forcefully makes the point that the relatively complex, well-grounded biogeographies of the Cenozoic are almost an order of magnitude more reliable than those of the pre-Cenozoic, the Paleozoic being most speculative. This comment applies as well to ocean surface current reconstructions and accompanying paleogeographies. We have essentially no understanding about the location of oceanic gateways in time or space for the Paleozoic. Paleozoic biogeographies require that there have been barriers of one kind or another to reproductive communication, resulting in reproductive isolation leading to endemism, but locations remain essentially unspecified and highly speculative. All of this indicates the need for more detailed, reliable paleogeographies for the older time intervals, without which our understanding of the overall biogeographic picture suffers. In principle biogeographic analysis should include every group of organisms present in the time interval under consideration being critically considered by well informed specialists. However, in practice this is never the case for the following reasons: 1) some groups are of such scattered occurrence and are so rare as to provide limited biogeographic data, Paleozoic echinoids being an example; 2) many groups although numerically abundant in appropriate environments have not been carefully collected or studied in many parts of the world, Paleozoic echinoderms and ostracodes being good examples; 3) during every time interval, Cambrian to present, well informed specialists have been overly attracted to certain groups while leaving other groups relatively unstudied, with molluscs being favored in the post-Triassic as contrasted with brachiopods and trilobites in the Paleozoic. Consideration of this volume indicates that trilobites are the favored group for biogeographic analysis in the Cambrian and Early Ordovician, trilobites and brachiopods in the later Ordovician, brachiopods in the post-Ordovician Paleozoic, and ammonoids together with bivalves and gastropods in the Jurassic and Cretaceous, with bivalves and gastropods dominating the Cenozoic story. Beginning with the Carboniferous foraminifera are of great utility for biogeographic purposes, with the benthics dominating this field. Australian biogeographic practice in this volume conforms to practice elsewhere. All of this reflects the relative abundances of some groups as contrasted with others (eurypterids will presumably never be of much utility in Paleozoic biogeography), and the attention devoted to some groups as contrasted with others. It is notable that among the palynomorphs there is very helpful biogeographic information from higher land plant pollen and spores in the Cenozoic, helpful information within the Jurassic and Cretaceous, but far more limited data for the Paleozoic. The palynomorph situation presumably reflects economic utility as much as anything. The overall scanty data for chitinozoans and acritarchs is a gap that needs to be filled. Vertebrates in the Paleozoic are relatively rare, which results in their biogeographic utility being reduced to considering the global distributions available from a very small data set; the situation in much of the Mesozoic is better, whereas that in the Cenozoic is considerably better. Higher land plant biogeography is of limited utility at present for the Devonian (Silurian localities are too uncommon globally to be useful), but of far more value in the Carboniferous and younger strata, with the chief limitation being the small number of paleobotanists available to study the varied floras. Perhaps the most telling point driven home by this book is the overall lack of the necessary taxonomic work on group after group of fossils. This problem could be easily pointed out for most parts of the world, i.e., its not just an antipodean headache, The book makes it very clear that reliable biogeography depends on reliable taxonomy and biostratigraphy, without which there is confusion. One wishes that administrators in responsible positions would take the trouble to read enough of this treatment to understand how much basic taxonomy and biostratigraphy remains undone, again not just in the Antipodes. For organismal group after group there is the unwelcome note that inadequate data are currently available with which to arrive at reliable biogeographic conclusions, although this comment is in no way intended to downplay the monumental effort that has gone into the descriptions of the groups discussed. It is also made clear that for all too many time intervals too few and inadequate fossil localities are known, i.e., a lot more effort needs to be put into the geological mapping that commonly turns up new localities, as well as having individual specialists spend more time in the field trying to uncover "missing" biotas from time intervals of concern. Finally, this is an excellent treatment of the topic that deserves to be copied in other parts of the world; it sets a new and higher standard for Phanerozoic biogeography. It is time to follow this new route rather than continue the printing of volumes that deal in a hit or miss way with this or that group of organisms through this or that time interval to achieve a pot-pourri that leaves the reader wondering what is left undone. posted by J. Laurie, AGSO, Canberra
Partial index: