| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Paleoneteers, It's too bad that we can't reconcile the interests of "collectors" versus "scientists." They are complimentary -- the former can provide desperately needed money to excavate and restore fossils, and the latter provide the scientific information that generates even more fascination. It would be nice to create a huge database "registry" of privately held fossils, in which all scientific information about them was available for statistical work. A "registered" fossil would become more valuable than a bootleg fossil -- and most collectors would be proud to know that their specimens were part of legitimate science. It would also help build relationships between wealthy collectors. Many take better care of their fossils than museums, and might end up donating them to museums after their death. Finally, cash-strapped museums could raise money by selling extra "registered" specimens. Something like this already goes on with meteorite collectors. Maybe all that is needed is the proper organization. -- JD Pristis@aol.com wrote: > Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain) > Encoding: 7bit
Partial index: