| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I also must come down on the side of Biology. Remember that Geology, as much as we love it, is the same as Chemistry, Physics, Biology except that the time factor is paramount; it is the science of temporal change as applied to the other sciences. Although in many areas, like stratigraphy, it has unique applications. Come to think of it evolution should be a Geologic topic but, except in SOME :-( paleo classes, it is biology topic. Biologists could use our sense of scale at times and we theirs. I can remember way back at the second paleo conference at the Univ of Kansas when Gould and Eldridge's following dominated the meeting (mid '70's). At that meeting I was having a few with some evolutionary biologists and they were not kind to the geologists and thought that it was all some sort of elabrate joke being played on paleontologists. To them punct. equil. (by other names) was old hat Mayr stuff, which of course it was (and is). Jon
Partial index: