| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I think Jere hit close to the secret of dinos' success as cultural icons when he pointed out that the really popular ones are big and different. In my opinion, "different" is the key. Dinosaurs are the original aliens. They look like nothing most people have ever seen and this otherness is deeply attractive. We all crave new sights, sounds, and experiences. Dinosaurs allow us to fulfill that craving. I think this also explains why people who are obviously interested in these beasts don't take the time to learn more about them. At some level the craving is for sheer spectacle. Like looking at an iceberg, a forest fire, or a really striking skyscraper, the spectacle can be so overwhelming that the intellectual side gets shut out. Since spectacle is all most people want from dinosaurs (or any type of natural history phenomenon) the difference between Jurassic Park and The Lost World is academic. They are both about spectacle and they both succeed in that task. Therefore, it doesn't matter that one made a more consistent attempt to be scientifically accurate. At least, it doesn't matter to many other than the types of people who subscribe to listservers like PaleoNet. The trick for us is to learn how to turn this attraction to difference to some more useful end (= something other than trying to make a buck). Norm MacLeod ___________________________________________________________________ Dr. Norman MacLeod Micropalaeontological Research N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (E-mail) Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD Office Phone: 0171-938-9006 Dept. FAX: 0171-938-9277 E-mail: N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk ___________________________________________________________________
Partial index: