| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In response to Jere's "Invitation for electronic...." It happens that a couple of days ago I sent Stefan Bengtson a comment on the white paper on Publications on the Paleo21 website, and I suppose it will do no harm to copy it here for wider consideration and discussion. ....................... Having been involved in innumerable discussions about electronic publication in geology, I have come to believe that profitable discourse on this topic requires allaying participants' concerns about two other aspects of publication - convenience and archiving. Unless those two aspects are laid to rest at the beginning of a discussion, they cloud and muddle people's thinking about electronic publishing per se. Convenience and archiving are of course both mentioned in your white paper, but I think that the whole discussion of electronic publication will proceed more effectively if they are separated out cleanly and dealt with convincingly. Convenience. Your paper rightly points out that "The ability to print material will remain important as long as the average reader is more comfortable with reading from paper than on-screen. This will ... be until monitors are as easy to read and carry around as sheets of paper." I don't have any special knowledge as to how soon that state of affairs can be anticipated, but I think that we should recognize that it is not in the foreseeable future. Thus people need to be firmly assured that electronic publications will be paralleled by a version printable on paper. This will require acknowledging that some components of an electronic publication will not be printable (animation, sound,...) - but this consideration is not of much practical importance since they will rarely be used. This paper publication will likely not be of the kind to which we are accustomed - durably bound books in which only a few chapters are of interest to the reader, and journals with a high proportion of articles of no interest to any particular researcher. It will be much more of an "on demand" process. I don't know it is in Europe, but the US is pretty well covered by copying outlets under the name of "Kinko's", who can accept electronic files and use Xerox DocuTech systems to produce well printed, bound paper copies of books and articles for individual readers at a reasonable cost. Such facilities are sure to become widespread in the near future. Until they do, researchers in less well technologically endowed places can presumably obtain printed items by mail from such a copying outlet. Conclusion - People need not worry about losing access to materials printed on paper. Archiving. This is very likely a subset of the printing-on-paper concern. There are plans for some libraries to act as enduring repositories for electronic publications, but not many geologists are confident that those repositories will be able to maintain readability of large volumes of electronic documents as the technologies for storage and display undergo frequent change. Provided that discussion participants can be convinced that archive-quality paper copies of literature will be available for library storage, they will not be distractingly worried over the issue of long-term accessibility - so important for the scientific enterprise. W. Riedel Scripps Institution of Oceanography UCSD La Jolla, CA 92093-0220 wriedel@ucsd.edu phone (619) 534-4386 fax (619) 534-0784 . . . . May the Force be with you . . . .
Partial index: