| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Neale Monks wrote: > Heinz & Andy Ross wrote:- > > >>Hibernation seems the most plausible reason why insects were hardly affected > >>by the K/T boundary event. > > Or perhaps there wasn't much to affect them? > > Neale. > I suggest reading Conrad Labandeira's work a little more closely, especially the paper in Science (1993) v. 261:310-315. The insect mouthpart study form the 92 NACP abstract will be in the next Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. I think insects are one of the groups that were buffed from the effects of the impact. All life was not wiped out--some groups preferentially survived. Neal-- If you think not much happened, compare what was walking around on land in late Cretaceous communities with what was present in early Paleocene communities on land.
Partial index: