| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Dear All, I'm in the middle of trying to use a cladistic approach to figure out the relationships between certain heteromorph ammonites. The traditional approach has been to look for intermediates. There are remarkably few features that can be used, and some of them are probably of low taxonomic worth (such as density of ribbing, whorl section). So is it worth weighting up those features that are more likely to be useful? Opinion seems to be mixed here at the museum...so what does the greater palaeontological community think? Best wishes and thanks... Neale. >From Neale Monks' PowerBook, at... Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD Internet: N.Monks@nhm.ac.uk, Telephone: 0171-938-9007
Partial index: