| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In addition to the comments by Roopnarin and Bengtson, you should also consider the effect of kinetics (i.e., disequalibrium precipitation) as distinct from "vital effects", which may be attributable to symbiotic energy cycling, etc. For an elegant study that deconvolves kinetic and "vital" effects in zooxanthellate scleractinians, check out: McConnaughey, T., 1989, 13C and 18O isotopic disequilibrium in biological carbonates: I. patterns, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, pp. 151-162. McConnaughey, T., 1989, 13C and 18O isotopic disequilibrium in biological carbonates: II. in vitro simulation of kinetic isotope effects, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, pp. 163-171. Other factors to consider: If infaunal benthic forams, to what sediment depth may a given species dwell and to what degree do individuals shift depth over ontogeny/biomineralization? Stable istope values (particulary carbon) may strongly vary with little depth change near the sediment-water interface. If planktonic forams, consider the degree of seasonality in surface waters, timing/duration of reproduction/biomineralization patterns, etc. Your idea remains an interesting angle, keep paleonet posted! Stephen Schellenberg Department of Earth Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0740
Partial index: