| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
>So here is the question for you to kick around: Based on our knowledge >of mass extinctions and recoveries -life has always managed to recover, >including the big one (Permian/Triassic)- how concerned is the >paleontological community regarding the current 'mass extinction'? > Although paleontology is the best way we have of predicting the possible effects of such extinctions, the pattern of recovery (if any) and similar issues, "concern" seems to me to be more of a philosophical than scientific issue. Most paleontologists whose views on this I know (including me) think that we ought to try to conserve biodiversity. Science does not evaluate whether this attitude or a "anything which doesn't survive was unfit or unlucky-too bad for it (or us)" attitute is better. David Campbell "old seashells" Department of Geology CB 3315 Mitchell Hall University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599-3315 bivalve@email.unc.edu
Partial index: