| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
On Fri, 15 Mar 1996, David H Goodwin wrote: > > Greetings all. I was recently involved in an interesting debate > regarding biodiversity. Many students were lamenting the current state > of declining biodiversity. I mentioned that in an abstract way human > perturbations of the Earth's ecosystems are akin to other stochastic > processes, ie. Boloid impacts, climate change and sea level fluctuations. > I was not advocating a suicidal mindset where we do not concern ourselves > with environmental/ecological problems. > > However, as paleontologists we have perhaps the greatest insight > into the implications of decreasing biodiversity. > > So here is the question for you to kick around: Based on our knowledge > of mass extinctions and recoveries -life has always managed to recover, > including the big one (Permian/Triassic)- how concerned is the > paleontological community regarding the current 'mass extinction'? > > David Goodwin > MS Student > University of Montana > Paleontologists may have a unique prespective on mass extinctions from the point of view of their stochastic nature and the inevitiable biotic recovery that follows, but that does not mean the we want to be responsible for causing one. After all, paleontolgists are part of the global biosphere now and dependent on it for our existence, not to mention the benefits that a diverse biota provide us. Ecosystems are too complex for us to either control or predict the outcome of unwitting experiments we may conduct on them. As paleontologists, we also have a unique perspective on the evolution of diversity, which the product of continuing spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity. We know that environmental change is the norm and that models and conservation measures that treat ecosystems as equilibrium or static entities through time will break down as the physical environment changes (this particularly at a time when human activities are accellerating these changes as well!). What is the use of a wildlife refuge for example, set aside for posterity to preserve a particular habitat and its organisms, which, when climate changes or sea level rises, becomes a different habitat for which its inhabitants are unsuited. Human activity has resulted in reduction in spatial heterogeneity and attempts to limit temporal change in some situations and dramatically accellerate it others. I guess that one of our challenges is to develop conservation strategies that can preserve an environmental heterogeneity that is robust enough that longer term changes can result in shifts and readjustments of biota (as has been the case in most of Phanerozoic history) rather than a series of local ecological collapses. Mike Melchin, Chair Geology Dept., St. F.X. University P.O. Box 5000, Antigonish, N.S., Can B2G 2W5 902-867-5177, FAX - 902-867-5153 mmelchin@stfx.ca
Partial index: