| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Mail*Link(r) SMTP Whittier Update TO THE PALEO COMMUNITY The last two weeks have been filled with highs and lows. The members of the Whittier College geology department are humbled by the support we have received from numerous sources. (This afternoon I counted more than 50 friends, colleagues, and alums who have written to the Dean in support of the geology program.) Because this event seems to have raised so much interest and concern, I felt that I should share with you what has transpired since my first panic. The issue on campus has two distinctive aspects--what was done and how it was done. Dean Richard Millman's total absence of consultation with the affected departments or any representative body of the faculty before announcing his proposal at a Board of Trustees meeting has raised the eyebrows (if not the ire) of many of the faculty members on this campus elsewhere. Our Faculty Executive Council (the elected officers of the Faculty) is pursuing this matter. The geology department has focused on the substance of the proposal. Millman has stated that this move was driven by his perception of the need to reallocate faculty resources (although he has not said what areas are likely to be the beneficiaries). Thus, this is not being presented as a "cost-cutting" move, rather it is this dean's notion that in order for other disciplines to be enriched, geology should be sacrificed. Millman's explanation for his decision to eliminate the geology department involves the relatively small number of majors in the program (and therefore the low enrollment in courses for the major) and the centrality of geology to the mission of the college. In more than one for forum he has now stated that when he looked at the "low enrolled" departments he identified five: French, physics, religious studies, philosophy, and geology. He has continued that he could not imagine a liberal arts college without French, physics, or philosophy, and that, given Whittier's Quaker heritage, he felt that religious studies was essential here. That left geology. (I should note that he also proposed closing our department of speech pathology and audiology (SPA) for reasons of mission, not enrollment.) Two weeks ago tomorrow, Millman's proposal was first publicly presented to the faculty at a meeting of our Educational Policies Committee. He outlined his proposal for the committee and the affected departments were then given an opportunity to respond. I spoke about the accomplishments of our department, its faculty and students, but tried to focus my remarks on the importance of geology as a discipline. As the only department at Whittier that concerns the Earth and the only discipline that speaks to issues of global environment and the immediacy of geological processes on an active plate margin, I agued that (biased as I am) I could not imagine a quality liberal arts college in California WITHOUT a geology department. These same themes have been sounded repeatedly in many of the letters of support. The members of EPC and other faculty members in attendance asked questions of the dean. Eventually, the committee decided to take up the question again at it next meeting (which is tomorrow) when the departments would be given the opportunity to organize their thoughts and make a more formal response. Last Friday the faculty of our science division (biology, chemistry, physics, geology, and math) met to consider a group response to the proposal. We presented our case to our colleagues and talked at length about the impact of the proposal on all the sciences at Whittier. The outcome of this meeting will be a consensus statement of support for the geology program. The social science division will meet for a similar purpose tomorrow. We will wait to see what that produces. Tomorrow's meeting of EPC is likely to be extremely important, but probably not decisive. I truly do not have any certain sense of what the outcome will be. I cannot thank those who have offered suggestions, ideas, and support sufficiently for their concern. I want to take special note of the help we have received from GSA. I've had several conversations with Eldridge Moores, as current president of GSA, and Ed Geary, director of education. I think we all now understand the need to be prepared for these events. The lights aren't going out yet at least. I will let everyone know what happens. Dallas D. Rhodes, Chair Department of Geology Whittier College Whittier, CA 90608
Partial index: