| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I still don't know what extra compexity is involved in citing literature with different formats, at least in the citing. David does raise the legitimate concern of pagination on an electronic document. A convention will be needed, but it need not be any worse than trying to figure out the figure-vs-plate issue now. In Web-based documents, figures need not have a page; they could simply exist as free-standing documents (pages), referred to by figure number. Pagination of text could be standardized by journals simply by insisting on page margins, font size, and lines per page. Page layout would be a concern of the past; references to figures can be imbedded as links in documents; text would not be offset by figures. It is no more complex to find email documents at libraries than it is paper documents, and it will be a lot easier for all libraries to stock all journals, so I don't have to track down copies at obscure libraries who may not let them out for loan. I expect that library-based access will impose order on the present chaotic Web. (People have to remember: this means of electronic access has only been widely visible and accessible for months, or a couple of years at most. Library updates of electronic databases might be far cheaper than computerization of card catalogs. If libraries choose the simplest possible text and photo storage, it might only require a re-write of front-end software to update access for users. As for access - I don't need software to read the old literature either, but I do have to spend hundreds of dollars to travel to a library that has that old literature, if I want to look at it in person. I'd rather sit in my own office and read it there on-line.
Partial index: