| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Let me try again. Last week I posted a query regarding the lengths of dinosaur necks, and apparently phrased the query poorly. The responses centered around bipedalism rather than neck lengths. Let me rephrase the question: The neck lengths of bipedal predatory dinosaurs appear greater than those of quadrupedal predators (alive or dead) of similar size. Why? I realize that answering this question requires some speculation, but I would like to hear some speculation from professional vertebrate paleontologists with knowledge of dinosaur skeletal morphology. I am a physiologist interested in paleobiology, which seems to be a field based on informed speculation. A long neck comes with a lot of physiological "baggage" attached, mostly to assure adequate ventilation of the gas exchange regions of the lung. A long neck is not the most energetically efficient means of getting air from the outside world into a lung. It must have had other advantages in an active predator with two legs that were not necessary in a four-legged version. Incidentally, it would seem to me (an amateur paleontologist) that a longish neck would have been a disadvantage in an arboreal creature, if indeed the "trees down" theory for explaining dinosaur bipedalism and avian flight is correct. I would appreciate your thoughts. James M. Norton, Ph.D. University of New England Biddeford, ME 04005 phone: (207)283-0171 fax: (207)283-3249 email: jnorton@mailbox.une.edu
Partial index: