| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
From: florin@quartz.geology.utoronto.ca (F. Neumann) Subject: Re: Marry, or partially mirror, MicroPal and Paleonet? (posted for W. Riedal) To: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 11:54:08 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Status: O N. MacLeod writes: > From: William Riedel 619-534-4386 <wriedel@ucsd.edu> > Subject: Marry, or partially mirror, MicroPal and Paleonet? > Status: O > > > Or, more precisely, might it not be desirable to duplicate intensely graphic > and/or interactive paleontologic elements at the Berkeley and London sites > (exhibits, paleonet forum, image collections, etc.)? > [...] > Would it be possible to duplicate the interactive programs at ucmp1 at nhm, > and vice versa? I ask this in complete ignorance of the logical and > political implications, but as one who suspects that there is substantial > overlap between the subscribers to micropal and to paleonet. >From what I understand it's perfectly possible to mirror ftp archives and www sites. In fact, I know of one US www site that is mirrored in Europe to speed up access; as to the heavily accessed ftp archives, such as the ones at Stanford or at the U of Michigan, there are many mirrors of those on every continent. However, I'm ignorant of the logistical requirements (other than equivalent disk space). -- Florin Neumann florin@quartz.geology.utoronto.ca
Partial index: