| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
X-Sender: neam@mailserver.nhm.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 17:44:52 +0100 To: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk From: N.Monks@nhm.ac.uk (Neale Monks) Subject: Re: Role of Systematics Status: O Dear All, Part of the problem with systematics in the general sphere of biology is that the 'species' is not an SI unit. It means different things to different people, especially if one is a palaeontologist and the other a neotologist. For a biologist, many species (especially for those in groups like graptolites or ammonites, where the diversity could be as much an artefact of the alacrity with which workers study the groups as anything else) is the suspicion that the species concept of each discipline is about as similar as a degree Celsius and a degree Farenheit! Measuring the same thing, yes, but the numbers might not really be comparable! Just a thought.... Neale. >From Neale Monks' PowerBook, at... Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD Internet: N.Monks@nhm.ac.uk, Telephone: 0171-938-9007 "...now Nature is having the last laugh. The freaky stuff is turning out to be the mathematics of the natural world" from 'Arcadia', by Tom Stoppard
Partial index: