Re: discussions regarding taphonomy

From
Date
Reply-To
Hi Christopher Whittle--

Thank you for your prompt and erudite response (included) to my enquiry
regarding taphonomy.  Given the profundity of your answer, it is little
wonder why so few attempt the herculean task of becoming an "expert". 

But please, for the sake of discussion, consider a specimen found in the
magnesian marlstone, lacustrine deposits of the western interior of the
United States.  This specimen is of the tipulidae family.  It is a complete,
full-bodied specimen.   Both patterned wings are present, each being 2.6 cm
in length.  Each is extended nearly perpendicular to the body with every
vein clearly discernable.  Halteres are noted on both sides of the body.
Individual eggs are clearly visible within the abdomen of this fecund fly.
Examination of the faceted eyes shows the ommatidial support structures.
Within each structural harness can be counted at least 300 "facets", their
diameter being measured in microns.   Mouthparts are present and complete.
Both obverse and reverse of the specimen are present.  This specimen,
deposited inter-varvely, is of middle-Eocene age.   Buried in the matrix, in
close proximity to this specimen, rests a specimen of a beetle and of a fly,
both showing excellent preservation.
  
For you to more clearly understand the taphonomy of the above described,
actual specimen, which questions would you pose and which answers would you
seek? 


At 07:28 AM 8/31/95 -0600, you wrote:
>They die, they fall in the water (or vice versa), they sink, they get 
>covered up, then they get mooshed by more sediment.  Ask a specific question.
>
>