| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
>> IRIDIUM
> >
>> Terry also queries the relevance of iridium. This is now
>> recorded from over a hundred sites in the K-T boundary rocks >>from
>> all continents and from deep-sea cores. Even though Alvarez et
>> al. only had th ree sites for their original paper they guessed
>> right that it would turn out to be world-wide.
>True. However the interesting thing is that at *some* sites there
>appear to be several iridium spike, rather than just one. (This
>is variable from site to site, but still notworthy).
'Multiple Iridium spikes" need also be taken in the context of the
depositional history of the stratum in question. I believe at least one (Hell
Creek?? I forget where ) had more than one Ir spike but can be explained by
the fact that the formation was created by a fluvial stream complex. In such
a highly variable depositional setting, not only fossils can be reworked but
so can the geochemical signature of an impact.
Regards,
Thomas R. Lipka
Paleontological/Geological Studies
Partial index: