[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Undeliverable Message



To:            paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
Cc:            
Subject:       Re: Milankovich Cycles

Message not delivered to recipients below.  Press F1 for help with VNM
error codes.               

	VNM3043:  Esther Asselin@CGQ@GSC QUEBEC

------------------  Error number Explanation Follows -------------------

VNM3043 -- MAILBOX IS FULL.

   The message cannot be delivered because the
   recipient's mailbox contains the maximum number of 
   messages, as set by the system administrator.  The
   recipient must delete some messages before any
   other messages can be delivered.
   
   The default limit is 1000 messages.  Administrators 
   can set lower limits if required using the Change
   mailbox settings function available in the Manage
   User menu (MUSER).  The 1000 message limit is the
   maximum allowed by the Mail program.  If this limit
   is reached, the recipient must delete some of
   the messages before the mailbox can accept any more
   incoming messages.


----------------------  Original Message Follows  ----------------------

>If the extinction of dinosaurs, etal, is due to an impact induced >imbalance
in
>the late Cretaceous environment, then the events took place during >a
shorter ti
>me interval than the resolution of stratigraphy.

This I think is very likely. What is the finest time interval that can be
detected to within acceptible error estimates? 10^3 years? 10^4 years? Even a
large impact such as the Cicxulub one would not have caused any long term
environmental effects lasting  that long. Decades maybe. The biotic
consequences ( mass extinctions)  would take less time to begin ( weeks or
months) after the environment was stressed  but could last for much longer
periods on the levels that we are seeing them. But then you get into sampling
bias and the Signor-Lipps effect to further confuse things.


 The evidence can >only be coinc
>idental. There has to be "reasonable guilt." For some what is >reasonable is
wha
>t is popular! What would be an "absolute proof?"I don't know!
                                                        
Only the test of time and maybe another large impact (God forbid!) .

                                     Regards,
                                     Thomas R. Lipka
                                     Paleontological/Geological Studies