| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Hello, Are you objecting to generals and other opportunists, or to the email volume that is generated by the broadcasting of reprints (or preprints or culled volumes of forgotten lore), or to the fact that when you hit REPLY in your emailer it automatically replies to the list and not to the author to whom you wanted to reply in the first place, or to the manors of those broadcasting a personal message to the entire list? The REPLY TO address is set by paleonet to be paleonet itself, so we should all remember to force the intended recipient's address when we intend to reply offlist. And it is not unreasonable for us to "me too!" offlist instead of onlist. (I too want to read that paper, but I've not "me too"-ed yet). On an unrealted note: Hey Judith! Christopher On Sep 21, 2006, at 6:03 PM, Judith Harris wrote: > Hmmm. > > > judith harris > emerita professor > university of colorado museum > p.o. box 278 > chama, nm 87520 > harrisj@valornet.com > > > On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:34 PM, argo@u.washington.edu wrote: > >> Im really object to using palenet for broadcasting reprints, and >> then having to endure all the responses. With regard to the >> subject of the paper, a very similar set of conclusions was >> reached by Jost Wiedmann almost 40 years ago. The specialists >> die, new generalists appear. >> >> Professor Peter D Ward >> Dept of Biology >> The University of Washington >> Seattle, 98195 >> 206-543-2962 ( Office ) >> >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, John VanRegenmorter wrote: >> >>> I would also like to recieve a copy of this paper. >>> Thanks >>> John Van Regenmorter >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
Partial index: