[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Re: paleonet New creationist allegation



These are all really cool.  I practically inhaled them hehehe.
 
Michael J. Kishel
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: paleonet New creationist allegation

They are talking about a couple of recent articles by Mary Schweitzer et al. on soft tissue in Tyrannosaurus rex.  These are:  M. H. Schweitzer,  J. L. Wittmeyer, J. R. Horner, and J. A Toporski, Science 307, 1952(2005)

Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex

Mary H. Schweitzer,1,2,3* Jennifer L. Wittmeyer,1 John R. Horner,3 Jan K. Toporski4{dagger}

Soft tissues are preserved within hindlimb elements of Tyrannosaurus rex (Museum of the Rockies specimen 1125). Removal of the mineral phase reveals transparent, flexible, hollow blood vessels containing small round microstructures that can be expressed from the vessels into solution. Some regions of the demineralized bone matrix are highly fibrous, and the matrix possesses elasticity and resilience. Three populations of microstructures have cell-like morphology. Thus, some dinosaurian soft tissues may retain some of their original flexibility, elasticity, and resilience.

1 Department of Marine, Earth, Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
2 North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
3 Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
4 Carnegie Institution of Washington, Geophysical Laboratory, 5251 Broad Branch Road N.W., Washington, DC 20018, USA.

and
 
M. H. Schweitzer, J. L. Wittmeyer, and J. R. Horner, Gender-specific Reproductive Tissue in Ratites and Tyrranosaurus rex, Science Vol. 308, June 3, 2005, p. 1456-1460.
 

Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in Ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex

Mary H. Schweitzer,1,2,3* Jennifer L. Wittmeyer,1 John R. Horner3

Unambiguous indicators of gender in dinosaurs are usually lost during fossilization, along with other aspects of soft tissue anatomy. We report the presence of endosteally derived bone tissues lining the interior marrow cavities of portions of Tyrannosaurus rex (Museum of the Rockies specimen number 1125) hindlimb elements, and we hypothesize that these tissues are homologous to specialized avian tissues known as medullary bone. Because medullary bone is unique to female birds, its discovery in extinct dinosaurs solidifies the link between dinosaurs and birds, suggests similar reproductive strategies, and provides an objective means of gender differentiation in dinosaurs.

1 Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
2 North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA.
3 Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.

 
Don't know anything else about the planned meetings.
 
Rich Lane
-----Original Message-----
From: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk [mailto:paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk]On Behalf Of Michael Kishel
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:58 PM
To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
Subject: paleonet New creationist allegation

Hello all-
 
I just finished reading an article produced by the Creation Studies Institute in which they allege "the most recent findings of soft tissue in what is supposedly a 65-million year old dinosaur."  Does anybody have any idea what the hell they are talking about?  According to the article the creationists are now fighting among themselves as to whether the earth is 6000-10000 years old with literal 24 hour days from get go or whether it is billions of years old and one day in Genesis equals eons.  They are now hosting public debates with "expert" presenters to examine the "evidence."  Anybody know anything about this juicy dinosaur?
 
 
Michael J. Kishel