RE: paleonet New creationist allegation

["John Huntley" <huntley_john@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Schweitzer et al.  2005.  Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in 
Tyrannosaurus rex.  Nature, 307:1952-1955.

It's good to see the creationists are staying current with their 
cherry-picking and taking the literature out of context.

John


***************************************
John Warren Huntley
PhD Candidate, Department of Geosciences
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
***************************************





>From: "Michael Kishel" <mike@houseofshred.net>
>Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
>To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk>
>Subject: paleonet New creationist allegation
>Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:57:48 -0700
>
>Hello all-
>
>I just finished reading an article produced by the Creation Studies 
>Institute in which they allege "the most recent findings of soft tissue in 
>what is supposedly a 65-million year old dinosaur."  Does anybody have any 
>idea what the hell they are talking about?  According to the article the 
>creationists are now fighting among themselves as to whether the earth is 
>6000-10000 years old with literal 24 hour days from get go or whether it is 
>billions of years old and one day in Genesis equals eons.  They are now 
>hosting public debates with "expert" presenters to examine the "evidence."  
>Anybody know anything about this juicy dinosaur?
>
>
>Michael J. Kishel