| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
That is one of the stupidest articles I have ever read in my entire life. "Creationists are attracted to ID, and one of its founding fathers, University of California law professor Phillip Johnson, is a devout Presbyterian." Why are people wasting time trying to argue details about biology as evidence against ID when we get statements like this? One of the founding fathers of what they claim to be a biology theory is a LAW professor? If we were to make comments about religion they'd be up in arms about making comments on subjects we have no expertise in. Why do we then let them get away with it? Sorry, I feel like smacking something that article was so stupid. Preferably the nearest creationist. Breandán -- _______________________________________________ For the largest FREE email in Ireland (25MB) and 20MB of online file storage space - Visit http://www.campus.ie
Partial index: