[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I'll take a wild guess: sexual selection? Jack > -----Original Message----- > From: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk > [mailto:paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Peter Paul Smolka > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:48 PM > To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk > Subject: Re: paleonet peppered moth, out of Africa (only a > question for curiosty, all others please delete) > <Snip> > It is often said that Europeans got pale for reasons of > paleoclimatic conditions in the Pleistocene/Holocene. > > On the other hand (here the question): The Asians (Siberians, > Indians (in the sense of North America) and Inuit ("Eskimos") > experienced similar conditions (also ice margins and thus > precipitation, lack of insolation in North America). > > As the insolation was most likely comparable: Why didn t they > get pale? > > And: Why did they get a different skin and some (see research > the Wella company had to do) different hairs? > > Did they for example get earlier or later as we out of Africa?
Partial index: