[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Concerning the cheer-leading that goes on for society journals and online publishing ... I don't know the details of the economics of the magazines that are the "learned journals", but my friends in the more conventional publishing industry tell me that the "cover price" of the magazine makes up something like 1/3 of the actual cost of production and publishing. The rest of the costs of publication and the profit margin come from the sale of advertising space. In the commercial journals this comes from two main sources - the sale of equipment and software relevant to the discipline(s) covered by the magazine, and secondly from the recruitment adverts. If you want to make an impact on the policies and prices of the commercial journals, then you will have a much faster and greater effect if you can address this issue. If you can take some of that advertising revenue, then you will hit them in the only organ they care about (the wallet); if you can reduce the effectiveness of that advertising (e.g. by purchasing from people who don't advertise in the commercial journals AND telling the companies involved why you excluded them from the tendering process), you'll hit them in the wallet and you'll get their attention. Unfortunately, in both cases you're more likely to actually push the commercial journals into *raising* their cover price than reducing it. The area where a "grass roots" campaign is most likely to be rapidly effective is by repositioning recruitment advertising. In this respect I already see an appreciable amount of job advertising going past on the mailing list (ATTN: list manager : does a "Palaeonet-jobs" list sound credible?) ; moving some of that advertising onto the websites of (for example) Palaeo.Electronica should be comparatively easy (does P.E. have the database back-end to handle this sort of static, rapidly changing content, and to do the relevant billing ; is there a financial billing model?). How much of the recruitment advertising in e.g. Nature comes directly from the departments recruiting, and how much from institution-level Human Remains Mangling Offices (sorry, private joke, a friend is a Hunam Resources Manageress) who see the large commercial journals as a good institutional hedge against allegations of cronyism, discrimination etc. Is there a line here where the on-line journals could benefit from some targeted advertising? (An article in an on-line HRM journal would be particularly apposite.) -- Aidan Karley, Aberdeen, Scotland, Location: 57°10' N, 02°09' W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233 Written at Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:28 +0100
Partial index: