[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Re: Lets not degenerate into chat.paleonet



I totally agree with you!

Until Creationist either do not stop understanding their books literally or 
try to create bridges with sciences! As well as scientists become dogmatic 
hooked by format, prestige et al. do not allowing most of us developing 
science (just a hadful of chosen ones) Both are extremely harmful

"A danger to all paleontology professionals who seek grant money from the 
federal government.  Congress oversees the budget of the National Science 
Foundation and Congress is increasingly full of members who are 
fundamentalist Christians themselves or whom serve increasingly large (or 
vocal) fundamentalist constituencies."

I shall add to any evolutionary sciences...Remember that recent politicians 
in Europe such as Bush, Berlusconi, Aznar, Chirac have been linked to 
new-born extremist Christians!!!!! As well as funding is provided to a 
hadful of chosen ones that possess certain format bl;a, bla isolated and not 
caring from what the Christians are developing!

This is my last message on this matter...The matter is clear and close for 
me! I will struggle from respect and collaboration to not be marginalise 
from either side!

Xavier Panades I Blas, Ms

Please, send letters to:

55, Marksbury Road
Bedminster
Bristol BS3 5JY
England
European Community
cogombra@hotmail.com














From: Bill Chaisson/Deirdre Cunningham <chaisson@netacc.net>
Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Lets not degenerate into chat.paleonet
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:08:24 -0400

>I am speaking from experience of someone who has seen lists lose their 
>usefulness by changing their character and Paleonet has lately been 
>changing its character.

From Paleonet: A User's Guide

PaleoNet's operating model falls somewhere between an informal electronic 
journal and a very large social gathering of paleontological professionals 
(including students) convened to discuss current events in the field. As a 
subscriber, you can expect to find wide variety of information accessible 
through PaleoNet at any time. These include ongoing informal conversations 
about papers, ideas, techniques, requests for information, announcements, 
etc., set against a background of more formal contributions such as 
editorials, meeting reviews, book reviews, software reviews, and the like. 
The purpose of these exchanges is to put you in touch, and keep you in 
touch, with what is happening in paleontology. The key concept that makes 
PaleoNet work, however, is participation.

That science (any science) is to be viewed in isolation from the rest of the 
academy and the rest of society is, for me, anathema.  I consider the 
philosophical underpinnings of paleontology to be part of the field itself.  
Interpretation of data is strongly affected by the practitioner's 
understanding of the philosophy that guides the practice.

Both creationism and "intelligent design" ideas pose a threat to the 
practice of paleontology.  They are:
  a source of irritation and a challenge for paleontology professors whose 
students bring these ideas into the classroom with them.
a danger to all paleontology professionals who seek grant money from the 
federal government.  Congress oversees the budget of the National Science 
Foundation and Congress is increasingly full of members who are 
fundamentalist Christians themselves or whom serve increasingly large (or 
vocal) fundamentalist constituencies.
an obfuscating factor that distorts the perception of palentology by the 
general public.

If none of these constitute a "current event in the field" or does not "put 
you in touch, and keep you in touch, with what is happening in 
paleontology", then frankly I'm baffled.

Paleonet is not a real room with definite volume.  Discussion of intelligent 
design does not leave less room available for discussion of equipment 
design.

>My thinking is that a lot of creationism of the young earth stripe is 
>layscience and not really pseudoscience but this is not a place for me to 
>post about it.

What is "layscience"?  Creationism not any kind of science at all.
--
---------------------------------------------------
William P. Chaisson
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
University of Rochester
Rochester, NY  14627
607-387-3892