[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Re: paleonet Re: suitable discussion



>I agree, if you are saying that ID is a belief, not a
>science, and it has almost nothing to do with creationism,
>but instead with final causes.

Just to clarify, by "final causes" do you mean "ultimate causes"?

By the way, isn't Mr. Holterhoff's point of view what is usually 
called "Christian apologetic".  Conflating it with the ID movement 
seems unnecessary and confusing.

Bill
-- 
---------------------------------------------------
William P. Chaisson
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
University of Rochester
Rochester, NY  14627
607-387-3892