[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Just out of curiosity, Frank, how does the Intelligent Design hypothesis deal with animal behavior that, if designed, could be interpreted as being cruel? I'm not just talking about lions eating zebras here. I'd like an explanation of predatory wasp behavior. The wasps capture and sting caterpillars, paralyzing them with a toxin. The wasp then flies to its nest, carrying the hapless caterpillar, and lays an egg in it before walling it away in the dark. The egg hatches inside the caterpillar and, over a period of days, eats it alive from the inside. For more details, consult the very readable works of Henri Fabré. There is no evidence to suggest that the paralyzing venom acts as an anaesthetic. To the contrary: Wasp stings hurt. And predatory wasps are hardly uncommon; this sort of thing goes on all summer long in any garden. I see no intelligence in the initiation of wasp behavior, but perhaps you do. Can you explain these well-known observations in the context of the Intelligent Design hypothesis? I hope this example clarifies how science can address the question of Intelligent Design. Cheers, Andy Andrew K. Rindsberg -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
Partial index: