RE: paleonet Paleonet , teaching Science, creacionism and SPAM

["Xavier Panades I Blas" <cogombra@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I totally agree with Patricio that unfortunately this is a USA problem. You 
can use the VRTPALEO  (vrtpaleo@usc.edu) based THERE to develop such ideas.
Nevertheless, looking at how this issue was solved by most of Europeans a 
century ago may help you.

However, I would like that you accept my sincere support in this matter.

Cheers

Xavier Panades I Blas, Ms

Please, send letters to:

55, Marksbury Road
Bedminster
Bristol BS3 5JY
England
European Community
cogombra@hotmail.com














From: patricio@geo.ucm.es
Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
Subject: paleonet Paleonet , teaching Science, creacionism and SPAM
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:43:45 +0200 (CEST)

Dear Paleoneters,

Paleonet is becoming a list on the social abuse of creacionists. This
subject is concerning mainly to our US colleagues. The
palaeontologists from the old Europe almost forgot this discussions
about one century ago (much much recent however was in the Spanish
history, believe me).

What I am suggesting is that people interested in the social problems
of creacionism (pro- or contra-), should subscribe to a list about
that (or create it).  I understand that certain creacionism threads
could be of interest for the palaeontologists however, Paleonet is
beginig to be SPAM-ed with such creacionism threads.

Palaeontologists asking for new research ideas, methods not weel known
on fossil preparation, difficult to find bibliography, research
doubts, the contact e-mail of a missing colleague, press releases,
notes on meetings or simply asking for help are becoming a clear
minory in Paleonet.

Thanks,

Patricio Dominguez

********************************
Patricio DOMINGUEZ
Depto. Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de
Madrid
28040 Madrid, Spain
********************************