[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Dear Colleagues, John Laurie has responded to Andrew Rindsberg's query over the ending of 'Ediacaran'. I would add the following: 'Cambrian' is the adjectival form of 'Cambria', the Roman name for western Wales. In other words, like 'Ediacaran', it involves only the addition of 'n' to a place name. In a similar fashion, 'Silurian' derives from Siluria, the land of the Celtic tribe, the Silures. Note that Murchison, the author of the Silurian System, called his book on Welsh geology 'Siluria'. More generally, the Latin suffixes, -a and -ia, indicate a place (e.g. America, Australia). In English, we add an 'n' to create the adjectival form, which then is pressed into service as a noun in naming a chronostratigraphic or geochronological unit. Regards, Stephen Carey Stephen Carey Geology Department University of Ballarat PO Box 663 Ballarat Vic 3350 Australia tel +61-3-5327 9268 fax +61-3-5327 9144 e-mail s.carey@ballarat.edu.au >>> arindsberg@gsa.state.al.us 05/20/04 11:19pm >>> Curious minds want to know: Would anyone care to summarize the reasons that 'Ediacaran' was chosen over 'Sinian' and 'Vendian'? Priority is important but it is not the only consideration in stratigraphy. Also, why was the form 'Ediacaran' chosen over 'Ediacarian', the form that one would expect by analogy with Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, etc.? The suffix would have distinguished taphonomic (Ediacaran) and stratigraphic (Ediacarian) uses of the word. Both forms were in use: Google search shows 195 uses of 'Ediacaran Period' and 65 of 'Ediacarian Period'. Andrew K. Rindsberg Geological Survey of Alabama
Partial index: