[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I think one of the main reasons why palaeontology is losing funding and money is because palaeontologists are isolated from politics. Unlike conservationists for example, that get involved heavily in politics. We must make ourselves to be heard! Nonetheless, a good idea would be lobying goverments and politicians. A good report exhibiting that palaeontology uses modern methods and can discover vital knowledge about important current issues such as climatic changes, as well as could provide economic income such as exhibitions, Musems, tematic parks etc will increase the jobs and money in our field. I shall remember that a Russian scientist who got in politics or lobbied his goverment, was the main influence why they developed such a good space program in the past! I hope this helps! Xavier Panades I Blas, Ms Please, send letters to: 55, Marksbury Road Bedminster Bristol BS3 5JY England European Community cogombra@hotmail.com From: Frank Holterhoff <frank@matricus.com> Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk Subject: Re: paleonet AGI Report Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:54:05 -0600 Whew, thanks Norm...BTW, have we discussed how the Scots were oppressed by the English? Many paleontologists have ended up in the petroleum industry, some of whom originally intended to be academics. Some of these are doing paleontology within the petrolem industry setting, others not. In fact, I personally know of at least one in the last category who tries to continue paleontological research & publication on his own time, although I don't know how he can fit much in around career & family. I'm sure there are a number of others. Are there really lots of paleo jobs absolutely these days, or is it just a high ratio of jobs/candidates? If there were more candidates, many of these positions would probably be filled before you heard about them. F N. MacLeod wrote: >OK. The Kepkupaiui string has gone on way past long enough. Surely there's >something else of interest to talk about. For instance, I recently came >across an AGI report on the status of geosciences in US universities. The >url where with a link to the full report is: >http://www.earthscienceworld.org/careers/ The report seems to suggest >paleontology/stratigraphy has been the big loser in terms of faculty >positions between the 1980's and 2002. The histogram that compares the >stats for the various specialty groups showed a larger drop for >geochemists, but this was more than made up for by a net increase in >environmental geology positions, many of which would be environmental >geochemistry. Yet, I see lots of activity in terms of the paleo. job >market. What's the real story? Are academic paleontologists and palaeo. >programs being differentially singled out? Also, where do paleontologists >who don't go into academics find jobs these days? Many leave the field. But >are they any employment sectors where paleontologists can be >paleontologists that are growing? Last, but not least, how many >paleontology positions are there in the world right now? > >Norm MacLeod > >-- > > > >___________________________________________________________________ > >Dr. Norman MacLeod >Keeper of Palaeontology >The Natural History Museum, >Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD > > >(0)20-7942-5204 (Office) >(0)20-7942-5546 (Fax) >http://www.nhm.ac.uk/palaeontology/a&ss/nm.html (Web Page) > >___________________________________________________________________ -- Frank K. Holterhoff MATRICuS Inc. Physical Design Engineer 570 South Edmonds Lane, Suite 101 972-221-1614 ext. 18 Lewisville, Texas 75067 fax: 972-420-6895 USA frank@matricus.com www.matricus.com _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
Partial index: