[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Ken, > The pictures are indeed, unfortunately, not 100% clear to me-I wish I had the specimens in my hand to turn them around so I could view them from any angle I wanted. I wish I could somehow convey that sort of visual image, too... because they do look different under a binocular microscope... a layman's description might be something like: they are shaped very much like a mushroom, with a solid, rounded cap that overhangs a hollow underside and a centrally located stem. > So what I'm going to suggest now may not be correct at all, but the specimens remind me of rajiform teeth as possessed by e.g. dasyatids, pristids and mobulids. If this is true, you have always considered the specimens upside down. Should have placed all my orientations in quotes.... I really don't have a clue at this point which is top and bottom, but the rounded, shiny looks more like a crown than a root.. I'll take another look and see if I can turn it upside down in my mind's eye... > Examples of figures and references of these such rajiform teeth are in Monsch (1998, Palaeo-3, 143: 31-50). A standard reference work is still Cappetta's (1987) 'Chondrichthyes II' in Handbook of Paleoichthyology. But you probably knew this. I have Cappetta, bu tno Monsch.. thanks for the tip.. I'll check it out. Mike
Partial index: