[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
A friend of mine had a good analogy for the situation. Requiring a student to have a basic knowledge of the theory of evolution, and at least acceptance of the theory is a good idea. To give a student who absolutely does not give any credence in a theory which forms one of the backbones of paleontology is like giving a reccomendation to an astronomy student who thinks the sun revolves around the Earth. (Never have I seen it said that he refused to give a reccomendation to a student who believed in both evolution and a small part of creationism, though I could be wrong.) -Rebecca Fish From: jlipps <jlipps@uclink4.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk Subject: Re: paleonet A view of Prof. Dini and of what constitutes science. Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:05:16 -0800 Yes, the piece in Townhall.com was indeed biased. But I thought you might like to see another view of all of this. Know thy enemy! Or friend, as the case may be. _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Partial index: