[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Wonder how the classic Romans would have pronounced Richardoestesia. Sara Burch <sara@burch.cc> To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk> Sent by: cc: paleonet-owner@n Subject: Re: paleonet Re: Latin hm.ac.uk (written/pronounced) 07/26/02 05:20 PM Please respond to paleonet on 7/26/02 4:00 PM, Robert L. Fleisher wrote: > My best example, and a friend and I have collected several of them, is > Archaeopteryx. Customary, indeed virtually unanimous pronunciation, of > course, > is Ar-kee-OP-ter-ix. But the root words, as I understand it, are archaeo > (ancient) and pteryx (wing). So it seems to me that the appropriate > pronunciation is Ar-kee-o-TER-ix (which is, I gather, how the PT diphthong > would > be pronounced in Latin--or in Pterodactyl). Actually, the "ae" dipthong in latin is pronounced as "ay", so a theoretically correct pronunciation would be "ar-kay-o-TER-ix" Of course, its also very common among the layperson to pronounce Ankylosaurus, "an-klee-o-SAWR-us" instead of "an-kie-lo-SAWR-us". And, I've heard paleontologists pronounce Ornithischia "or-ni-THIS-kia" (with a soft TH), and "on-ni-THISH-ia". Same with Saurischia. So my point is, there are lots of mispronunciations and different pronunciations. In fact, they vary a lot from country to country. Even if it was standardized now, I have a feeling it would be like changing Brontosaurus to Apatosaurus, but worse! :) Sara
Partial index: