[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Dear colleagues, Norm MacLeod's message "Random Notes" is an important and, in my opinion, accurate assessment of the situation facing paleontology. Participants in Paleo21 must come to grips with the issues he raised if we are to be successful in laying groundwork for the future of paleontology. Perhaps it comes down to this. Practitioners of the various fields of geology--let's say paleontology, sedimentology, geochemistry, petrology, and geophysics--can devote themselves to solving intradisciplinary problems or to working on interdisciplinary, societal problems. The various fields of geology seem to flourish when they address primarily societal problems. Their apparent importance in the broad scheme of things is diminished when they focus their work on only intradisciplinary problems. If this overly broad generalization is so, the reasons for the growth in geochemistry and geophysics in the past 15 years reported by Karl Flessa and Dena Smith must stem at least in part from the fact that these fields have addressed societal problems: e.g., exploration for oil and gas, developing means of solving of environmental problems, and ensuring a supply of safe, clean water. Geophysicists, for example, have been actively involved in the search for petroleum, in attempting to understand devastating earthquakes, and--at the most mundane level--in developing means of detecting leaking, buried barrels of toxic waste. Low-temperature geochemists have focused attention on such topics as the leaching of heavy metals from landfills, pesticide and nutrient-laden runoff from agriculture, and other sources of pollution of surface and groundwater. Especially in the recent past, paleontologists have contributed to society through biostratigraphy. Fields of science that have focused on intradisciplinary research have failed to flourish. For example, for decades, it seems, metamorphic petrologists have worked on solving the problems of metamorphic petrology without any clear-cut attempt to apply their results to solving society's problems. As a result, the employment outlook for recently educated metamorphic petrologists in their chosen field of metamorphic petrology has been abysmal for decades. Paleontology is now in a very exciting period, one that will certainly be noted when the histories of our discipline written at the end of the 21st century. We are making unprecedented progress in understanding many aspects of the history of life: extinction events, recovery from mass extinction, and community evolution, to name only a few. Most of this work, however, consists of paleontologists solving the problems of paleontology. We should not be surprised, therefore, if society does not rush to our doorsteps with funds and positions to expand our discipline. This impetus to grow will come about only if we are somehow able to make the work of modern paleontology seem as important in the solution of society's problems as biostratigraphy has been in the past 150 years. This is not to say that what we are learning is not important. Of course it is important, even vital to the intellectual development of paleontology. Nevertheless, if during the coming century paleontologists devote themselves to solving only the problems of paleontology and not the problems of society, we cannot expect support for our science to keep pace with other disciplines that are aiming at the day-to-day problems that the ordinary citizen faces. Finding applications of much of what we do will not be easy. The view is sometimes expressed that society cannot understand the extinction event that is underway in the rain forest if we do not understand, for example, what happened at the Frasnian-Famennian boundary. I judge that this is mere grasping at straws and is likely to have the effect of drawing unfavorable attention to our plight and, perhaps, our lack of understanding of it. Best wishes, Roger L. Kaesler -- Roger L. Kaesler Paleontological Institute The University of Kansas 121 Lindley Hall Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2911 (913) 864-3338 = telephone (913) 864-5276 = FAX It is our job as editors to find meaning where none was intended.
Partial index: