[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I have just received the latest issue of _Palaeontology_ (Vol 40(1)), complete with tacky new orangy-reddy coloured jacket. Anyhow, the abstract of the paper entitled "Functional significance of the spines of the Ordovician lingulate brachiopod _Acanthambonia" by Anthony Wright and Jaak Nolvak (p. 113-119), drew my attention. The abstract begins: "A giraffid skull and mandible from the early Mid Miocene Kermaria Formation at Thymania (Island of Chios, Greece) has enabled revision of the genus _Georgiomeryx_. The new specimen is compared with attachment spines, supplimenting a pedicle which is functional throughout ontology and regarded as anchoring the animal possibly to algal strands above the see floor." Hmm, increase in giraffid neck length as an intertidal phenomenon perhaps?! This gets my vote for the best introduction to an abstract this year. The fact that the first sentence and a bit has been copied from the next abstract in the issue is besides the point :-) Chris cnedin@geology.adelaide.edu.au nedin@ediacara.org ------------------------------------------------------------------- Many say it was a mistake to come down from the trees, some say the move out of the oceans was a bad idea. Me, I say the stiffening of the notochord in the Cambrian was where it all went wrong, it was all downhill from there.
Partial index: