Stonehenge

From

Date
Priority
Reply-to

Further to recent postings, I include below (with Garry Denke's permission) the text of some
recent correspondence. This is not an ongoing 'conversation' as it might appear, but a single
message put together by Mr Denke. This was in response to a series of questions I asked; these
questions were prompted by initial contact from Mr Denke outlining his problem of the age of the
fill of the Aubrey Holes. It is well worth reading the entire message in order to appreciate
fully the broader context of this problem! XXXXX appears in place of names of individuals and
organizations.
M = my question (cut and pasted from my message, so some are a little out of context here)
G = response from Garry Denke

QUESTIONS-ANSWERS

M: A couple more questions arising from your message:

G: That's it? Only a couple more? Okay, I'll do my best to answer
them. But do not hesitate to ask questions. I desire to "once and
for all" get at the bottom of this matter and find out the truth.

M: This sounds like some micropalaeontological work has been done.

G: The fifty-six (56) Aubrey Holes and one (1) Heelstone Ditch
earthworks backfilled microfossil material was inspected in 1975
and the first twenty-four (24) elder microfossils species observed
were identified whose names are duly filed and recorded in the
Official Public Records (Deed Records) of Stonewall County, Texas.
We mailed this Legal Public Document to the Stonehenge people.
It's like this Mark, no one would publish the fact that these Lower
Carboniferous Late Tournaisian (High Tor) Limestone rocks were
hauled during the Neolithic to Stonehenge from the South Wales
Coast (Pembrokshire Coast National Park) area, even though they are
there. British Archaeologists have been destroying the evidence
for years, excavating and cementing the Aubrey Holes, and also
excavating most of the Heelstone Ditch (see Stonehenge in its
landscape, twentieth-century excavations, English Heritage, 1995).
But there is still enough "in situ" backfilled microfossil material
in the Aubrey Holes (I think) and in the Heelstone Ditch (Page 171
and Page 174 "Hard white chalk rubble") to verify the geologic age.
I found this microfossil material in our Family Bible, dated 1666.

M: Is that the case?

G: Box 96 is the case, the genuine Ark of the Covenant buried below
the lion, ox (calf), face as a man, and flying eagle petroglyphs of
the Southwest Face of Heelstone, turned that way [towards the seven
(7) stone archway of Stonehenge Inner Circle for observation], the
same petroglyphs recorded at Ezekiel Book 1:10 and Revelation Book
4:7. Daniel Book 7:1 describes the diverse petroglyphs beginning
with the same lion petroglyph having eagle's wings, the entire body
of the Heelstone Southwest Face looking like a bear leaning towards
the seven (7) stone archway, the leopard petroglyph of the South
Face (adjoining the ox face), and the ten (10) horned coral Lower
Carboniferous Late Tournaisian (High Tor) Limestone microfossils
being definitely elder than the Stonehenge native Upper Cretaceous
Late Senonian (Upper Chalk) Limestone [over ten thousand (10,000)
times ten thousand (10,000) years elder (Cretaceous/Carboniferous
hiatus spans over one hundred million years (100,000,000+ years)].
The Ancient of days is the case (Box 96), the Ark under Stone 96,
"Heelstone." Box 96's spoken Ezekiel's wheel over the same is of
"iron," and Box 96's building nails are of "brass," but no one
wants to excavate the Ark of the Covenant, the Revelation 4:1-10
"throne" (substitute "Ark of the Covenant" wherein Rev 4 reads
"throne"), until the ownership in and to the same is esablished.

But "the case," Mark, in your question, is about establishing when
it was first discovered that these first twenty-four (24) elders
(the older Lower Carboniferous - Early Mississippian) microfossils
circling round about Stonehenge and the Heelstone were found. I
would like to take credit for this, but I would be lying to you if
I did. The oldest written reference to this circling ditch serpent
of old (Genesis Book 3:1), and the he-goat from the west (South
Wales) rammed (Daniel Book 8:1) into the Heelstone Ditch, is the
Revelation Book 4:1-10, the twenty-four elders (microfossils) all
dressed in white Lower Carboniferous Late Tournaisian (High Tor).

M: If so, it would be useful to know who did it.

G: The Holy Bible says that Moses the prophet wrote the Genesis
Book, Daniel the prophet wrote the Daniel Book, and Jesus the
Christ wrote the Revelation Book, the Devonian evolved locusts and
scorpions, to boot. These are the first microfossil descriptions.

M: Is it published?

G: In every Hotel/Motel in the United States.

M: Do you have contact addresses and/or phone numbers for Mr.
XXXXX and Dr. XXXXX?

G: Mark, they are on the Internet. But I do not remember them. I
have a bunch of E-mail to answer about this matter. If you can not
find them, let me know, and I will look them up for you.

M: This all sound very legal, rather than the type of academic
literature source I am used to. It sounds like you have been
enganged in lengthy correspondence with XXXXX and the
XXXXX. Is this so?

G: Quite a legal matter, to be sure. And you can see why, I hope.
I have been claiming the sole ownership of the Ark of the Covenant
for decades, under the "Finders-Keepers" English Law, which was
first written in order that England could keep all of the "stolen
booty" illegally acquired from countries such as Greece. But when
they (XXXXX and XXXXX) received our first claim
in and to the "lost" Ark of the Covenant "found" by my company,
XXXXX, USA, they rewrote the "Finders-Keepers" English
Law to cut me out of my Ark of the Covenant. Every time we move I
mail them our new address and request them to mail me my "throne."
XXXXX and XXXXX has been ignoring me for years.

M: Is there some sort of dispute here?

G: Mark, if you only knew the events over the past twenty-eight
(28) years you would lose all faith in the legal system.

M: I am not against getting involved in contentious subjects,
provided I know what I am getting into.

G: The USA is changing Laws concerning fossil artifacts in the hope
of supporting XXXXXXXX, USA's claim, and the United Kingdom
has changed Laws concerning our claim in and to USA's Ark of the
Covenant (our claim still prevails). What does that tell you? Our
primary goal (as scientists) is to cause the proper and orderly
excavation of the Ark of the Covenant at the Heelstone before it is
looted. I continue telling everybody that I write. If XXXXXXX
and XXXXXXXXX waits any longer the ONLY Ark of the
Covenant will be looted, and all of their efforts to hide the elder
microfossils, et al, will be in vain. Our North Texas bulldozer
study at the Railroad Commission of Texas STONEHENGE oil field in
Baylor County, Texas clearly shows it would take less than ten (10)
minutes to push the Heelstone (70,000 US pounds at the shoulder of
the A-344, old Amesbury-Shrewton tollway) out of the way loot it.

[last few lines of message deleted]

Dr Mark A. Purnell

Department of Geology, University of Leicester
University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K
tel: +44 116 2523645 fax: +44 116 2523918
http://www.le.ac.uk/depts/gl/staff/map2.html