[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
What about rocks and minerals? Couldn't you send over samples of limestone and silica (which just might by accident have fossils in them, which you obviously didn't notice)? Also, I have heard of quarries of marble from Italy which are rich in fossils. Used for fireplace facing, wall facing, etc. Is this a recent law? Daryl Fuller, Vancouver > >Silvio Resesto wrote(in part): > >In Italy is allowed to purchase, sell > >or barter only fossils coming from abroad; any fossil coming from an italian > >locality is property of the government and has to be stored in a museum, in > >an university or other institution, its selling or bartering is forbidden by > >law, especially among private collectors. > > Glen Kuban replied: > Let me get this straight. Italy expects (and benefits from) other countries > open policy on fossils, but wants to strictly restrict its own? Well, isn't > that special? My reaction to this is the same as that to the posting > regarding Australian restrictions. I think it is a misguided and > counterproductive trend. Any nation (of museum) that hords its own fossils > cannot expect others to freely share theirs. The result if this catches on > will be a stiffling of the exchange of data and specimens, which paleontology > needs in order to thrive. It also benefits from encouraging amateur > collecting and use of fossils for teaching purposes--requiring all fossils to > be stored in a museum is also counterproductive. > > You'd think that governments and national scientific organizations would have > learned what most five year olds did while playing in the sandbox. If you > don't share with others, others are not likely to share with you. > > paleo@ix.netcom.com
Partial index: