[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
David Campbell's query regarding the level of confidence between different zonations prompts two comments: 1. the (incomplete) schism between publishing scientists in academia- government, and industry-consultants, must be overcome by somehow encouraging more industry and consulting scientists to make their data and interpretations public, as well as by enhancing mechanisms to encourage greater inter-sector collaboration, with publication as a more prominent goal, and 2. More emphasis should be placed on bringing together existing knowledge from a variety of sources, and making it widely available in publications. The huge investment in resources, and duplication of effort, by competing companies and consultants can perhaps never be completely overcome, but economics and the depleting pool of expertise available for paleontology, require that we should try as best we can. The multi-company Gulf Coast initiative seems to be a valuable initiative along these lines, as are multi-author volumes on regions such as the North Sea, the Atlantic, SE Asia, etc., but most of them are just a small step forward, and don't really address the question of duplication of effort. Somehow, industry-government-academia must proceed on a common front, and large internet-available data bases are an obvious tool. Terry Poulton Chief Paleontologist Geological Survey of Canada 3303-33 St, NW, Calgary Canada T2L 2A7 ph. (403) 292 7096 FAX (403) 292 6014 internet poulton@gsc.emr.ca
Partial index: