[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
>I believe that the dinosaurs became extinct due to climatic change and not by >an impact of a comet or a large meteorite! The demise was of the dinosaurs >was mainly due to the drying up of the shallow sea ways and other climate >changes! If a bolide impact destroyed the dinosaurs it would have wiped out >every living thing not just dinosaurs! Many organisms survived the K/T >boundary mass extiinction! It is as if the comet had the name dinosaur >because it only destroyed them and not other forms of life! The effects of a >bolide impact as described would have wiped out all animals and certainly >more species than survived the K/T boundary extinctions! What is the current >thought on this? >Regards, >Mike! :) :) More recent texts that I have seen suggest that 85% of all species of animals and plants (not just the dinosaurs) were wiped out at the K/T boundary. If this is a single-event catastrophy, the loss of 85% of species represents the loss of 99.9% of individuals. While not being a strong argument in its self, the proportion of organisms that were effected by the K/T event is much greater than you anticipate. Cheers, Paul pwillis@ozemail.com.au
Partial index: