[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Stefan.Bengtson@nrm.se (Stefan Bengtson) wrote: [on the issue of making manuscripts available on the WWW] The strategy I have adopted is to place a manuscript on the WWW when it is either close to or has been submitted for publication (subsquent to informal review by local colleagues), for the purpose of soliciting wider criticism. It is not as a replacement for subsequent publication or peer-review, and I would not want people to cite it as anything other than a "pers.comm." or "manuscript in prep.". The WWW document is only as much professional value to me or to others as it would be to pass paper copies of an unpublished paper around -- i.e. not much on job applications :-), and not a legitmate scientific citation in most circumstances. If peer-reviewed electronic journals form in the future, that may change. Currently, the information in that document and the expression of it is mine, but at the time the copyright is transferred to the publisher, I will remove it from the WWW, for two reasons: 1) If I transfer copyright, I do not have the right to present the entire paper in a form basically the same as the one to be published. 2) Upon publication, it is redundant. I will probably leave the illustrations of the fossil specimens and a brief summary on the WWW, though. If I can get some useful criticism in the time between preparation and copyright transfer, and help colleagues by giving them early access to information without having to spend money on mailing preliminary manuscripts to them, great, and I do not think this threatens the traditional publication process. -Andrew macrae@geo.ucalgary.ca home page: http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae
Partial index: