[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Stefan Bergston wrote: >It's rather fun and (at least sometimes) illuminating to go fault-finding >in Jurassic Park, but maybe we should be more bashful in our >Crichton/Spielberg-bashing. The team behind the movie have made a better >effort to get things "right" than most makers of science-fiction movies, so >let's grant them the right to add some details for effect as long as it's >not too flagrant or ridiculous. ... >I guess, though, that Bennington's kids might prefer finding plain errors >in the movie. No big problem, just as long as they remember that there are >errors and ERRORS and that even well-established TRVTHS occasionally turn >out to be errors. > These excellent points are well taken. However, I would point out that there are differences between professional paleontologists nitpicking Jurassic Park and asking Jr. High School students to question the scientific content of the movie. In the latter case, the objective is not to train kids to be cynical consumers of cinema, rather the goal is to teach them something about science (in this case dinosaurs and DNA) and then get them to apply what they have learned and think critically. In many ways, Jurassic Park is an ideal movie for this exercise precisely because it did strive (with much success) to get things right. There is enough fact to make the film credible, a few amusing gaffs to remind us that Hollywood lurks behind the screen, and much interesting science speculation to provide for lively discussions about what science does and doesn't know for certain about dinosaurs. J Bret Bennington Department of Geology 114 Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11550-1090 516-463-5568 FAX: 516-463-6010 E-mail: geojbb@vaxc.hofstra.edu
Partial index: