[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

G. Jenkins obituary (cross-posted from micropal by J. Lipps)



To: PaleoNet
From: N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (N. MacLeod)
Subject: G. Jenkins obituary (cross-posted from micropal by J. Lipps)
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:

D. Graham Jenkins passed away earlier this year.  He was prominent
paleontologist, working particularly in New Zealand and England.  Here is
George Scott's New Zealand memorial to him.

Jere Lipps

   DAVID GRAHAM JENKINS 1933 - 1995

       The death of Graham Jenkins on 6 August 1995 marks the passing
       of New Zealand's foremost student of fossil planktonic
       foraminifera.  He was one of a pioneer elite whose work led to
       great advances in global Cenozoic biostratigraphy and
       paleogeography.

       Graham was Welsh born (1933) and educated (Aberystwyth) and was
       quintessentially Welsh in personality and character.  Yet, New
       Zealand provided the base (BP Shell Todd 1959-62; New Zealand
       Geological Survey 1962-66; University of Canterbury 1966-77)
       from which he built much of his scientific career and he
       contributed substantially to our science until his death.  He
       was proudly Welsh but supported most things Kiwi, except rugby.
       He called himself a New Zealander (Jenkins 1995) and, in turn,
       we are proud to claim him as one of us.

       Cenozoic microfossil biostratigraphy was at the threshold of
       significant redefinition when, in 1956, Jenkins began his post-
       graduate research on the planktonic foraminifera of the Lakes
       Entrance Miocene sequence, Victoria.  The previous three decades
       had witnessed the development of regional Cenozoic
       biostratigraphies based on an eclectic mix of events,
       principally in benthic taxa, but with some in planktonic taxa.
       The work of Kleinpell in California, Renz in the Caribbean and
       Finlay in New Zealand was in this tradition.  Although their
       focus was regional, the research indicated the potential of
       planktonic events for heightening resolution and for global
       correlation.  A new paradigm began to emerge and the first
       examples of plankton biostratigraphies, developed from northern
       hemisphere regional data, appeared in the later nineteen
       fifties.

       The southern hemisphere pioneer was Graham Jenkins.  In
       retrospect, the Lakes Entrance assemblages, deposited from
       neritic water masses, were far from a felicitous choice for a
       neophyte plankton biostratigrapher charting new territory.  But
       Jenkins was extraordinarily capable.  Planktonic foraminifera
       taxa are commonly polytypic, sometimes with watermass-specific
       features.  Many are not readily identified.  The approach of
       pioneers like Jenkins and Blow was to focus on part of the field
       of perceived variation and restrict recognition to specimens
       exhibiting certain characters.  The approach may not accord with
       biological species theory, but it heightens objective
       recognition of 'taxa' and provides a basis for biostratigraphy.
       Using this approach Jenkins, an acute observer who was able to
       apply taxonomic concepts with great consistency, deciphered the
       rather atypical Lakes Entrance record, recognized the major
       events, and established a Miocene biostratigraphy that served as
       a prototype for subsequent southern hemisphere temperate water
       classifications.  The research (Jenkins 1960) was a notable
       attainment and established a methodology that he followed throughout
       his career.

       Jenkins' secondment (1959) from BP to a consortium exploring for
       hydrocarbons in Gisborne district enabled him to test and extend
       the classification developed for the Lakes Entrance sequence.
       Significantly, the licence areas included much of the Cenozoic
       sequence and provided him with his first overview of the
       history of southern temperate mid-latitude planktonic
       foraminifera.  The opportunity, indeed need, for a major
       research project on New Zealand Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera
       was apparent equally to him and to Norcott Hornibrook, and led to
       a 3-year research position for Graham at New Zealand Geological
       Survey.  This commenced late in 1962.  It gave him access to
       extensive collections from New Zealand and abroad, and technical
       facilities for an in-depth study of Cenozoic planktonic
       foraminifera.  The arrangement was entirely auspicious and led
       to the most productive period of his career (8 papers were
       published in 1964).  Jenkins was a young, extremely vigorous
       scientist with a developed methodology and clearly perceived
       goals.  He relished the work and enjoyed the research
       environment.  Colleagues at New Zealand Geological Survey recall
       the regularity of his work routine, the carefully organized
       laboratory bench, and the clear desk at end of the day.  Few
       have forgotten his debating skill at tea breaks, the flash and
       roll of his eyes, the thump of the table, the delightful mixture
       of English and Welsh expletives..iesumawr!

       The principal outcome was his monograph <New Zealand Cenozoic
       planktonic foraminifera> (Jenkins 1971, completed for
       publication January 1966) which documented 163 taxa, charted
       their stratigraphic ranges in 40 sections in onshore New
       Zealand, and established 21 zones.  Globally, there is no
       comparable, unified account of regional Cenozoic planktonic
       foraminiferal systematics and biostratigraphy.  It preceded the
       new perspectives provided by the ocean drilling programs and
       scanning electron microscopy, and some may quibble with the
       methodology, but its value as an encyclopaedic account of
       temperate latitude southern hemisphere planktonic foraminifera
       remains undiminished. It was a superb achievement.

       Students at Canterbury University struggled to comprehend
       Graham's departures from the local vernacular but were
       fascinated by his mannerisms and character, and impressed with
       his zeal for paleontology and biostratigraphy.  For Graham
       Jenkins remained a dedicated research scientist.  The focus
       widened at Canterbury to include the Mesozoic and Paleozoic, and
       his discoveries included the first records of condonts and
       Carboniferous strata in New Zealand.  But Cenozoic planktonic
       foraminifera remained the love of his life and he extended his
       knowledge of the group by shipboard work on Deep Sea Drilling
       Project Leg 9 (chief paleontologist) and on Leg 29.  He
       contributed substantially to the recognition, by Jim Kennett and
       others, of the initiation of the circum-Antarctic current at 30-
       31 Ma.  This was a fundamental paleoceanographic discovery.

       The Geological Society of New Zealand was firmly supported by
       Graham, and he contributed to its administration as secretary
       (1967-68) and as president (1974-75).  He was awarded the McKay
       Hammer in 1970 and was elected a fellow of the Royal Society of
       New Zealand in 1977.

       Graham moved to the Open University in 1977 and to the National
       Museum of Wales in 1990 but a focus on the southern hemisphere
       was retained.  He was with the shipboard party on Deep Sea
       Drilling Project Leg 90 (1983) and contributed major systematic
       and biostratigraphic reviews of southern hemisphere Cenozoic
       planktonic foraminifera (Jenkins 1985; 1993a; 1993b).  Concepts
       from his early research in New Zealand were honed and developed
       as the database improved.  One of his last papers (Hornibrook
       and Jenkins 1994) re-interpreted the sequence at Deep Sea
       Drilling Project Site 594, Chatham Rise.

       This Newsletter was one of the windows through which he
       monitored geoscience research in New Zealand.  His last
       contribution (Jenkins 1995) is typically Jenkinsian in style,
       yet helpfully suggests the next step in the resolution of a
       paleogeographic problem, and asserts the value of global
       perspectives.  As a scientist of international stature, his
       continued support of our science was invaluable.

       The drive and energy of the tyro of 35 years ago never
       diminished.  What came later was the ability to provide
       leadership in science.  The IUGS Subcommission on Paleogene
       Stratigraphy was revitalized during his terms as secretary
       (1984-89) and chairman (1989-).  Read the incisive comments of
       the chairman in its recent newsletters.  Acknowledge too, the
       effective editorial and production skills of Judith Jenkins, and
       recall with gratitude her unstinting support of Graham
       throughout his career.

       In their publications, scientists seldom stray far from science.
       Jenkins did.  In a collection of essays (Jenkins 1989) he allows
       us intimate views of his heritage and upbringing, and insights
       into his motivation and character.  The skilled chronicler of
       earth history was an equally acute observer of the human
       condition.

       The pioneers of Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal research were
       often remarkable men.  Jenkins was one of them.  Au revoir
       Graham, we were privileged to have you with us.


       George Scott

       References

       Hornibrook, N. deB.; Jenkins, D.G. 1994. DSDP Site 594, Chatham
         Rise, New Zealand - late Neogene planktonic foraminiferal
         biostratigraphy revised. <Journal of Micropalaeontology 13>:93-
         101.

       Jenkins, D.G. 1960. Planktonic foraminifera from the Lakes
         Entrance oil shaft, Victoria, Australia.
         <Micropaleontology 6>:345-371.

       ----------- 1971. New Zealand Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera.
         <New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin 42>.
         278 p.

       ----------- 1985. Southern mid-latitude Paleocene to Holocene
         planktonic foraminifera. <In>: Bolli, H.M. and Saunders, J.
        (eds) <Planktonic microfossil biostratigraphy>, Cambridge
         University Press. pp. 263-282.

       ----------- 1989. In the shadow of Jerwsalem. Alun Books, Port
        Talbot. 162 p.

       ----------- 1993a. Cenozoic southern mid- and high-latitude
         biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy based on planktonic
         foraminifera. <In>: The Antarctic paleoenvironment: a
         perspective on global change. <Antarctic Research Series,
         American Geophysical Union 60>:125-144.

       ----------- 1993b. The evolution of the Cenozoic southern high-
         and mid-latitude planktonic foraminiferal faunas. <In>: The
         Antarctic paleoenvironment: a perspective on global change.
         <Antarctic Research Series, American Geophysical Union 60>:
         175-194.

       ---------- 1995. Letter to the Editor.  <Geological Society of
       New Zealand Newsletter 106>:4-5.