[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Re: Foreman/Riedel radiolarian catalog possibility



Here are the wayward msgs:

> From MAILER-DAEMON@sdsioa.UCSD.EDU Thu Jul  6 18:04:01 1995
> Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@sdsioa.UCSD.EDU>
> Received: from ucsd.edu by geomag.gly.fsu.edu with SMTP (5.65/31geomag)
> 	id AA09310; Thu, 6 Jul 95 18:03:58 -0400
> Received: from sdsioa.UCSD.EDU by mail.ucsd.edu; id OAA17009
> 	sendmail 8.6.12/UCSD-2.2-sun via SMTP
> 	Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:58:23 -0700 for <wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> Received: from dsioa by sdsioa.UCSD.EDU (5.0/UCSDGENERIC.5)
> 	id AA00386 to wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu; Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:58:34 -0700
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:58:34 -0700
> From: MAILER-DAEMON@sdsioa.UCSD.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
> Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
> Message-Id: <9507062158.AA00386@sdsioa.UCSD.EDU>
> To: <wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> Content-Length: 2628
> Status: R
> 
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> <<< HELO geomag.gly.fsu.edu
> <<< MAIL From:<wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> <<< RCPT To:<wreidel@sdsioa.ucsd.edu>
> 550 <wreidel@sdsioa.ucsd.edu>... User unknown
> <<< DATA
> 
>    ----- Unsent message follows -----
> Received: from geomag.gly.fsu.edu by sdsioa.UCSD.EDU (5.0/UCSDGENERIC.5)
> 	id AA00384 to ; Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:58:34 -0700
> Received:  by geomag.gly.fsu.edu (5.65/31geomag)
> 	id AA09307; Thu, 6 Jul 95 18:03:51 -0400
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 95 18:03:51 -0400
> From: Woody Wise <wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> Message-Id: <9507062203.AA09307@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> To: wreidel@sdsioa.ucsd.edu
> Subject: retrans
> Cc: wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu
> content-length: 1872
> 
> > From john_firth@odp.tamu.edu Thu Jul  6 16:50:33 1995
> > Return-Path: <john_firth@odp.tamu.edu>
> > Received: from MAIL.TAMU.EDU by geomag.gly.fsu.edu with SMTP (5.65/31geomag)
> > 	id AA08848; Thu, 6 Jul 95 16:50:32 -0400
> > Received: from odp.tamu.edu (ODP.TAMU.EDU [165.91.52.69]) by mail.tamu.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id OAA20778 for <wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>; Thu, 6 Jul 1995 14:47:58 -0500
> > From: john_firth@odp.tamu.edu
> > Received: from ccMail by odp.tamu.edu (SMTPLINK V2.10.03)
> > 	id AA805067259; Thu, 06 Jul 95 14:45:17 CDT
> > Date: Thu, 06 Jul 95 14:45:17 CDT
> > Message-Id: <9506068050.AA805067259@odp.tamu.edu>
> > To: Woody Wise <wise@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> > Subject: Re[2]: FTP
> > Status: R
> > 
> > Woody:
> > 
> > Ill be sure to hit return in my messages so they fit on your
> > screen.
> > 
> > 
> > I found a few other spheoliths whose photos didnt come up under
> > the similar species list.
> > 
> > I was in S. dissimilis and couldnt bring up the photo for S. conicus
> > I was in S. conicus and couldnt bring up the photo for S. dissimils
> > I was in S. annarhopus and couldnt bring up the photo for S. conspicuus
> > 
> > 
> > I suppose you can fix these quickly right, like the others?
> > 
> > I also noticed that there was no generic description for
> > Triquetrorhabdids et al., though there was for each genus in that
> > group.  IS this a glitch or is ther really no text for that grouping?
> > 
> > 
> > I also assume you have corrected, or are correcting now, the C. leptoprus
> >  vs. C. leptoporus
> > centrovalis descriptions so they are in the right place, and have
> > fixed the display for the Neogene and Paleogene sphenolith descriptions?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please let me know ASAP when those have been corrected,or that they will be 
> > corrected for us, as I will be 
> > giving you the go ahead for the CD pretty soon. 
> > 
> > 
> > Those are all the problems I found.
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > JOhn
> > 
> > 
> 
> From wise Thu Jul  6 18:02:59 1995
> Return-Path: <wise>
> Received:  by geomag.gly.fsu.edu (5.65/31geomag)
> 	id AA09294; Thu, 6 Jul 95 18:02:55 -0400
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 95 18:02:55 -0400
> From: Woody Wise <wise>
> Full-Name: Woody Wise
> Message-Id: <9507062202.AA09294@geomag.gly.fsu.edu>
> To: john_firth@odp.tamu.edu
> Subject: Re:  Re[2]: FTP
> Cc: wise, wreidel@sdsioa.ucsd.edu
> Status: R
> 
> Hi John -- You are right about those spheno flags for no similar species.
> I'll ask Darren to come in tomorrow and we will root out those kinds of
> things.  
> 
> You are also right about the Triquetrorhabdulus et al.  That is the
> same behavior I get when I try that same button for the Neogene and
> Paleogene sphenoliths.  What appears is a little short line in
> the upper left corner about the size of a letter "l".  Did you
> notice that?  It is like all of the txt has imploded into that
> one spot (kinda like the Big Crunch).  Linda will have to deal with
> that or tell how to fix it from here. 
> 
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to raise Linda all day. She doesn't
> have email and her answering machine isn't kicking in.  Better give us
> time to sort that last problem out.  I'll send her a FAX and try to
> reach her tomorrow.  --W
>