[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Regarding the recent posts about "families" carrying equal weight and whether one "family" may be included within another "family" violates much of what we now follow in phylogenetic systematics. The classical Linnean hierarchy does not follow a phylogenetic order. The question is not, therefore, how many families existed at one time or another. Studies such as Benton's, though a good compendium, must only be viewed as approximations of alpha-level numbers of taxa. One cannot argue about "families," "orders," or any other level, without imposing some artificial classificatory scheme. Recent papers for consideration: a series of papers by de Queiroz and Gauthier, mostly in Systematic Biology, with comments by Harold Bryant and Spencer Lucas. Dan Bryant
Partial index: