[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
To Doug: Come on. These guys are physicists. They don't need natural historians with messy data that are always consistent with a slew of different interpretations putting constraints on THEIR theories. No attempt to test the reasonableness of this model with detailed data from any fossil record. To Una: I agree with everything you've said, especially the point about multiple causes. That's what I think we're looking at in the K/T fossil record and that's why it's defied all previous attempts to find a single pattern. To John: I agree with your characterization (caricaturization? :) ) of the philosophical differences separating us. But I disagree with your interpretation(s). To respond in detail would be to go back over the same ground. Let's call it a day and move on to other things. If anyone out there wants a reprint of the MacLeod and Keller paper that John Alroy and I have been discussing I still have some left. It's best for the arguments made therein to be read in their entirety. Norm MacLeod ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman MacLeod Senior Research Fellow N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (Internet) N.MacLeod@uk.ac.nhm (Janet) Address: Dept. of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD Office Phone: 071-938-9006 Dept. FAX: 071-938-9277 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial index: