[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I got the following question by private e-mail and want to post the answer to the net because it may promote the discussion about microfossil preparation techniques. "..., does it really work for getting out forams? My experience is that when forams are really indurated and diagenetically altered they disintegrate in the process of getting them out of the rocks. What is your experience?" Yes, this is a real problem. Diagenetically altered forams may become fragile but I am not quite sure if it is always the preparation that destroys them. I did my PhD thesis work on foram stratigraphy and basin dynamics in Cretaceous pelagic (hard) limestones in the Alps. I had to study them in polished slabs and thin sections because the foraminifera were broken already in many samples. In fact it was the rock matrix that kept them together. Any isolation (e.g. washing with any technique) would have resulted in a tremendous loss of specimens. I can really recommend to look at thin sections of such problematic rocks before decisions are made on preparation techniques. Much of what is considered as alteration of a fauna by the preparation technique could be "in the rock" already: Fracturing by mechanical forces (tectonic or diagenetic), recrystallisation and subsequent deformation (which can be extreme), dissolution of the shell, and much more. It is often better to determine planktic foraminifera (at least the Cretaceous forms that I know) in large polished surfaces or thin sections rather than to try to wash the sample. The problem is the sample statistics. Small sections may not yield enough specimens for a reliable record of all species. The size of the polished surfaces to look at can be computed from the abundance of forams in the rock. In polished slabs I appreciated to see the sedimentology of the foram samples: winnowing, sorting of forams by species through hydrodynamics, forams as building materials of burrows, indications of all sorts of reworking, and many more processes that can alter the information content of a microfossil sample. When I look at a washed sample I feel somewhat "blind" after this experience. Yours Heinz ============================================================ Heinz Hilbrecht Geological Institute, ETH Zentrum, Sonneggstr. 5, CH-8092 Zuerich, Switzerland Tel.: ++41-1-63 23676, Fax: ++41-1-63 21080, Internet: Hilbrecht@erdw.ethz.ch ============================================================
Partial index: