[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I have been reading all of the tips on dissaggregation with great interest. I still find the "kerosene method" to be ther best for most harder samples. As Jere mentioned it was the method of choice at UCLA and still was up to the mid 80's when I was there although those burning pots were a bit disconcerting. I still use it today here at Carleton but had to jump through lots of hoops with our safety people. Samples have to be seived many times to ensure that virtually no kerosece is being heated. In addition we cannot allow any kerosence to escape into the environment (i.e. down the drain) Anyway if one can come to an aggreement with campus environmental police I think that kerosene is the way to go. I used quaternary-o for a little while but discontinued it even prior to it being pulled from the market because it dissolved many of the more delicate calcareous foraminifera. Jean-Pierre Guilbault in Montreal recently told me that he did an experiment with quaterary-o and found similar results. Not too good if you are interested in the whole foram population. Don't know what some of these newer agents do but it might be worth splitting a sample and seeing if they are as hard on samples as quaternary-o was. Tim Patterson R. Timothy Patterson Associate Professor Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 tpatters@ccs.carleton.ca
Partial index: